Return to Normal View

DOE Homepage Students Educators Community Family Administrators and Staff MyFlorida.com
 

 School Accountability Reports  

Text Index Google Custom Search
Florida School Grading System
You selected:
District: DADE
Years: 2006-2007
School Grades:
Report Type: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
  
Modify Selections | Return to Summary Reports | Return to List of Schools |
2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Dade SOUTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 7721
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 Read: 1338
Math: 1333   		2006-2007
School Grade1:		 C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students? 		Math
Tested 95% of the students? 		51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 56% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading		 Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math		 % of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N
TOTAL4  98  Y  98  Y  34  N  58  Y  85   86  Y  59  60  N  69  66  NA 44  42  NA 46  NA  73  NA 
WHITE  94  N  94  N    NA    NA  93   91  Y  63  70  Y      NA     NA        
BLACK  97  Y  98  Y  22  N  33  N  78   79  Y  70  53  N  86  78  NA 57  67  NA 36  NA  58  NA 
HISPANIC  98  Y  98  Y  34  N  58  Y  84   86  Y  58  59  Y  69  66  NA 45  42  NA 47  NA  75  NA 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA  60  75  NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  98  Y  98  Y  29  N  52  N  80   83  Y  58  54  N  73  71  NA 50  48  NA 43  NA  69  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  98  Y  98  Y  7  N  37  N  53   64  Y  43  44  Y  92  93  NA 68  63  NA 34  NA  75  NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  91  N  91  N  10  N  18  N  69   61  N  31  33  Y  80  90  NA 73  82  NA 25  NA  49  NA 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable. 		 
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the school's tested population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total. Growth Model: If any group does not meet the proficiency and safe harbor requirements, the percentage of students in that group who are on track to be proficient within three years should be 51% for reading and 56% for math. That group must also make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for the Growth Model if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2009. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.